No Easy Answer
Unfortunately, there is no easy
answer. Prevention must be tailored to each individual farm. There are too many
variables that will affect the life cycle of the parasites, the types of
parasites present in a herd, the parasites' survivability in the environment,
and even the likelihood of contamination of herd members.
Factors to consider include:
- The individual farm's geography:
A farm in Maine, a farm in Georgia, a farm in Colorado, and a farm in
California are all likely to encounter different problems. Variations will
include climate, foliage, soil and even species of parasites.
- The farm's layout: This includes
pasture design as well as shelter availability and location. The ability (or
lack of ability) to rotate animals to "safe" pastures and rest
contaminated pastures will affect contamination and recontamination of herd
mates.
- Deworming history of individual
animals, farm history, stocking density, exposure to transient or outside
animals, exposure to animals with unknown history or exposure to infected
animals: All of these factors will influence the level and type of parasitic
challenge in the environment.
In addition, when formulating a parasite
prevention or treatment plan, fecal egg counts should be used to measure the
level of parasitic infection in a herd, and the effectiveness of the
eradication program.
Identifying At Risk Animals
While fecal egg counts are
important in identifying parasites and degree of contamination, at risk
populations and target groups also need to be established. Factors to be
considered include age, nutritional status and presence or absence of clinical
signs. Younger animals, particularly crias and weanlings, are going to be your
animals most susceptible to the presence of parasites in the environment.
Animals that have a poor body condition, or a lack of weight gain or weight
loss should also be evaluated for parasites. Those animals that are immunocompromised,
suffering other diseases or under stress (i.e., recent weaning, transportation,
change in environment), are also going to be in a high-risk category.
In many cases,
clinical signs do not truly reflect the direct parasitic damage. Many of these
parasites cause damage to the lining of the gastro-intestinal tract. This may
affect the animal's ability to digest feed and absorb nutrients. Other
parasites may cause anemia due to blood loss. Clinical signs, if present, may
include lethargy, diarrhea, inappetance, weight loss, lack of weight gain, poor
condition, sudden collapse, and death. The lack of clinical signs does not mean
that an animal is not at risk of suddenly becoming very ill and/or dying.
Treatment will
almost always involve deworming; however, even with effective elimination of
parasites, severely affected animals may still be at risk of illness or dying
due to secondary damage to the gastro-intestinal tract. In severe cases,
aggressive supportive care may be needed. This may include I.V. fluids, plasma,
and/or a blood transfusion. The economic ramifications involved in treating a
sick animal or actually losing an animal make treatment more costly than
prevention.
Fecal Egg Counts
The only effective way of
identifying individual at risk animals is through fecal egg counts. This allows
the identification of the parasitic species involved, the degree of
infestation, and the degree of environmental contamination, and determines if
and when animals should be dewormed. In addition, fecal egg counts can be used
to evaluate the effectiveness of the anthelmintics being utilized.
If you request a
fecal analysis from your veterinarian, make sure he/she is not using a simple
fecal float for analysis. Because the level of parasites tends to be low, a
special procedure known as a modified Stoll's method is used to separate the
eggs from the other material in the test tube. If your veterinarian is not
prepared to evaluate the fecal sample, he/she may choose to send it to a
university with a veterinary teaching hospital where the sample can be analyzed
by a parasitologist.
When evaluating
a herd, fecal samples need to be collected and evaluated on a sufficient number
of animals. A gold standard is to use fecal samples from 10 animals or 10% of
the herd--whichever is the greater number. The herd average is a reflection of
the environmental contamination. Once a sample is collected, it should be
placed in a clean plastic bag or cup and labeled. If it is not going to be
evaluated immediately, it should be placed in a refrigerator. A sample should
be analyzed within a day or two of collection to obtain the most accurate
results.
Fecal samples
analyzed prior to treatment should be compared to fecal samples collected two
weeks post-treatment to establish efficacy of the anthelmintic. A drop in
parasite numbers of at least 90% should be observed. Most parasites have a
two-three week life cycle. Waiting this long will allow any surviving parasites
to repeat another cycle, reach maturity and have eggs present in the feces. A
significant presence of parasites two weeks after treatment would indicate an
ineffective "kill" by the anthelmintic utilized.
During extremely
cold periods, parasites may go into a state of hypobiosis within the animal.
This is a metabolically inactive period and may result in a carry- over to the spring
of a heavy parasite load. Fecal egg counts taken during a period of hypobiosis
may result in false negative findings.
As with any of
the pharmaceutical products used in veterinary medicine, anthelmintics are not
labeled for camelid use. Extra-label use has been studied and safe dosages have
been established. You should use extreme caution when using anthelmintics on
pregnant animals or crias less than three months of age. If in doubt, consult
with your veterinarian on the suitability of a product and its dosage.
So why would an anthelmintic fail?
There are a number of reasons:
- Resistance: The frequent use of a
single class of anthelmintic will encourage the development of resistance to
any and possibly all drugs within that class. "Class" of anthelmintic
refers to the "family" of chemicals used to produce the anthelmintic.
Products within the same class use the same method of kill to eliminate the
parasites. Anthelmintics from different classes use different kill methods.
Parasites have survived every attempt man has made to eradicate them by
developing resistance to kill methods. When this occurs, another kill method or
class of anthelmintic must be utilized.
- Example: Ivermectin and Doramectin are
both Avermectins and, therefore, within the same class. Because they use the
same kill method, rotating between them will most likely not decrease
resistance! Fenbendazole is from a different class, Benzimidazoles, and should
be effective if resistance to the Avermectins has developed.
- Under-dosing: Dosing for the
incorrect body weight will lead to the administration of the wrong dose. Under-dosing
can lead to an insufficient kill of the parasites. Not only will the problem
remain, but it can also be worsened as under-dosing can contribute to the
establishment of resistance to an anthelmintic.
- Improper administration: Spit
happens! An anthelmintic will not be effective if it is spit onto the ground!
Likewise, a subcutaneous injection will be ineffective if the needle is poked
through the skin and the injection is squirted out the other side of the skin.
If you are unsure of techniques, ask your veterinarian to review them with you.
- Recontamination (part I): Rotate!
Rotate! Rotate! Returning animals to contaminated fields will lead to recontamination
of the recently treated animals. Ideally, treat, wait 72 hours for any live
parasites to be shed, and then move treated animals to a "clean"
field. Keep in mind that if the animals are moved to a new field but are utilizing
the same shelter, they may still be exposed to the same contaminated
environment.
- If environmental
contamination is suspected, fecal samples analyzed prior to treatment should be
compared to fecal samples collected six weeks post-treatment (don't confuse
this with the two week check for anthelmintic effectiveness--you'll need to do
both tests to distinguish between resistance and recontamination). The six-week
period allows sufficient time for animals to be re-exposed, re-infected, and allows
sufficient time for the parasites to reproduce.
- When planning
how long to keep animals off of contaminated fields, keep in mind the
conditions of the field, the climate, and the time of year. Many parasites
thrive in warm, moist conditions and can survive in hospitable conditions in
the environment. During hot, summer months, they may survive in the pasture for
30-60 days. This can be increased in cooler weather by up to 4 to 8 months,
depending on the species of parasite.
- Rotating with
other species can be useful to help manage field availability. However, while
horses and donkeys are okay, sheep and goats share parasites with camelids and
sharing grazing space with them can lead to very high parasite levels in the
camelids.
- Recontamination (part II): If
even one animal is not effectively dewormed, it can re-contaminate your field
and re-infect the rest of the herd! No drug is 100% effective. Also, not all
animals will respond to a drug the same way. Retesting allows for the
identification of ineffective drugs. It also allows for the identification of “trouble
animals." These are the repeat offenders who continue to be infected
following treatment.
Other considerations
- Overcrowding: The ideal stocking
density is 3-4 llamas or 5-6 alpacas per acre. This does not include your
rotational fields. If every available pasture is in use, there is no room for
rotation. If the stocking density is higher than the suggested level, the
animals are more likely to come into contact with fecal material and parasite
eggs. If animals are being forced to graze near dung piles, there are too many
animals or the grazing area is not large enough.
- Farm layout and management:
Evaluate field dynamics to determine the ideal location for feeders and
shelters. Try to separate the bathroom from the kitchen by placing feeders away
from the dung pile. While it may be impossible to prevent defecating in or
around the shelters, every attempt should be made to maintain cleanliness where
the animals cush. If a dam cushes near a dung pile, the teats will likely be
contaminated and the cria exposed to parasites.
- Age segregation
can help decrease exposure to susceptible youngsters. Adults can be
asymptomatic carriers--shedding parasites without any disease. The parasites
that might not affect an adult may cause severe disease and even death in
crias.
- Biosecurity: Quarantine all new
animals—including animals brought in for breeding, returning from breeding
farms, or returning from events. Younger animals and pregnant females in
particular should never be exposed to transient animals. Keep in mind that
human visitors can track in parasites to your farm on their shoes, clothing
and/or hands! Plastic booties and hand washing are two sensible examples of how
risk can be decreased.
- Aside from a
quarantine area, consider establishing a remote area on your farm for mobile
breeding. This may involve either shipping in a stud to cover your females or
shipping in females for a one day breeding only to your male. The transient
animal is brought to a pen that is only used for breeding. Other than the
animals being bred, no other animals should enter this pen. The pen is then
disinfected following breeding--rubber mats are easier to disinfect than a dirt
floor. If you must keep breeding animals overnight or for any extended period
of time, you should have quarters for them separated from the rest of your
herd.
- Good biosecurity
practices not only keep parasites from sneaking into your herd, but also can
help prevent the spread of infectious disease!
Decreasing the use of drugs:
- Hygiene: Cleaning dung piles is a
start, but keep in mind that feces may also be tracked on foot pads and
deposited into shelters and near feeders. Keep those areas clean and avoid
feeding off the around.
- Utilize pastures/grazing systems:
Ideally, stay within the suggested stocking density and practice field
rotation. If your stocking density is higher than ideal, try to develop grazing
strategies to allow higher numbers of animals on less land. This may involve
splitting existing fields to allow for some field rotation. Long, narrow lots
are less efficient than square/rectangular lots.
- Optimize host immune resistance:
A healthy animal will be more resistant to parasites and to the effects of
parasitism. You can improve your animals' immune function through good
nutrition.
Take home message:
- Work with your veterinarian in
establishing good strategies to prevent illness due to parasites.
- Frequent deworming is destined to
create resistance to the chemicals being used!
- Use management and fecal egg
counts to decrease the exposure to parasites and the use of chemicals.
Biography:
Shari C. Silverman is a graduate
of the University of Pennyslvania School of Veterinary Medicine. Good health
management and a need for compassionate care for small ruminants, camelids, and
horses are what prompted Dr. Shari Silverman to establish Abbey Rose Veterinary
Services. Serving clients and patients throughout New Jersey and Eastern
Pennsylvania, the practice provides wellness programs, educational seminars and
programs, as well as emergency services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. In her
spare time, Dr. Silverman flies planes, kayaks and plays on her farm where she
lives with her husband and many different animal friends.
Shari Silverman, VMD
Abbey Rose Veterinary Services